Benj. P. Avery to R. M. Johnson, June 18, 1875

Mr. Avery to Mr. Johnson.

Sir: Under date of June 3 I addressed Prince Kung in a communication, copy of which is inclosed for your information, detailing the circumstances of the repeated attacks on American missionaries and their premises at Shui Chang, which were made the subject of an appeal to me in your No. 344. You will see from his reply, copy of which is also inclosed, that his imperial highness has forwarded a copy of my complaint and demand for redress to the superintendent of trade for the southern ports, with orders to have the local authorities “make most careful investigation into the real facts of the case, and settle it justly.”

This reference, and the manner in which it is made, encourages me to expect that satisfactory results will follow. I attach some importance to the fact that my own suggestion as to the mode of settlement and the issuance of a proclamation have been sent to so high an officer as the one named.

Shen Pao Shun, who has lately been appointed superintendent of trade for the southern ports, has been usually prompt and just in his dealings with foreigners, and the acting superintendent Lin is also a well-disposed executive.

Until the superintendent has reported under his instructions, I can do no more, unless officially informed that no action at all is being taken.

Before answering my communication referring to the Shin Chang troubles, Prince Kung addressed me, as per inclosure, on the subject of the Kiu-kiang affair, which had been so incorrectly reported to him that I was obliged to reply in the terms of the inclosure, which is sent for your information.

I was not sorry to be afforded so good an opportunity for the vindication of American citizens against unjust charges.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,