Alexander Hamilton writes to John Barker Church on December 6, 1787, mentioning that he has sent a brief and hurried note to Angelica Church. The letter primarily serves as a brief communication between Hamilton and the Church family during the post-Revolutionary period.
Alexander Hamilton writes to Angelica Schuyler Church expressing gratitude for her recent letter and sharing a playful, affectionate tone that likens their correspondence to that of lovers. He updates her on Kitty Livingston’s romantic situation, noting her near marriage to a devoted older widower that ultimately did not come to fruition. Hamilton blends personal news with a lighthearted, poetic style to convey his sentiments.
Ezekiel Forman requests Alexander Hamilton to confirm whether legal proceedings against Mr. Livingston were properly initiated and if any additional actions are needed to continue the lawsuit. He asks Hamilton to review the documents left with him, including the sheriff's accounts, to determine if they provide sufficient authority to proceed with the case.
Alexander Hamilton addresses William Neilson regarding the legal case of Hayton versus van Kleeck, which Neilson entrusted to him. Hamilton requests that Neilson manage the payment of his legal costs associated with the case. The letter reflects Hamilton's involvement in legal matters and his reliance on Neilson for financial arrangements.
Alexander Hamilton defends his authorship of a published critique targeting a high-ranking official's self-serving actions detrimental to the American Union. He rejects accusations of anonymity, stating he provided his name to the printer for disclosure to the governor's representatives. Hamilton argues his publication is an honorable effort to expose political corruption rather than a baseless attack.
David Humphreys informs Alexander Hamilton about a politically charged letter circulating in Connecticut, likely produced locally and embraced by Loyalists. Humphreys discusses efforts to trace its origin and suggests the letter may have been written to gauge public apathy toward government. He also notes attempts by Federalist supporters to use the letter to alarm Anti-Federalists into accepting the Constitutional Convention's outcomes.
Baron von Steuben appeals to Alexander Hamilton to support his claim for recognition and fulfillment of a contract made with the United States before his military service, which he argues the government has only partially honored. He emphasizes the contract’s validity as agreed upon by prominent officials and insists that failure to honor it threatens both his honor and financial well-being. Von Steuben seeks Hamilton’s advocacy to secure justice and prevent accusations of fraud against him.
Alexander Hamilton writes to Rufus King in 1787 seeking an update on the progress and anticipated completion of King's plans, which Hamilton has heard may have recently improved. Hamilton mentions his temporary absence due to legal duties but requests a prompt reply regarding the timeline.
Jeremiah Wadsworth informs Alexander Hamilton about a controversial letter circulating in Connecticut that appears intended to alarm the antifederalists, expressing uncertainty about the motives of Wetmore, a man connected to federalist circles. Wadsworth has tasked Colonel Humphry, a trusted associate familiar with Wetmore, to investigate the matter and report back to Hamilton.
Alexander Hamilton writes to Jeremiah Wadsworth seeking information about a suspicious letter circulating in Connecticut that may have been fabricated to undermine the Constitutional Convention's recommendations. Hamilton requests details on the letter's origin, the political affiliations of those spreading it, and the background of the intermediary Whitmore to trace its authorship. He emphasizes the importance of this inquiry for political reasons.