Topic

Letters about 19th Century

19,594 letters
Letter

Cushing to the tribunal by Mr. Cushing, in the name of the counsel of the United States, on the 21st August, 1872, and memorandum as to the enlistments for the Shenandoah at Melbourne, August 21, 1872

From Cushing
To the tribunal by Mr. Cushing, in the name of the counsel of the United States, on the 21st August, 1872, and memorandum as to the enlistments for the Shenandoah at Melbourne
August 21, 1872

[Translation.] VIII.—Observations addressed to the tribunal by Mr. Cushing, in the name of the counsel of the United States, on the 21st August, 1872, and memorandum as to the enlistments…

19th CenturyDiplomacyReconstruction
Letter

W aite to the argument of Sir Roundell Palmer, upon the special question as to supplies of coal in British ports to Confederate ships. (See protocol XIX.), August 8, 1872

From W aite
To the argument of Sir Roundell Palmer, upon the special question as to supplies of coal in British ports to Confederate ships. (See protocol XIX.)
August 8, 1872

VI.—Reply of Mr. Waite, August 8, to the argument of Sir Roundell Palmer, upon the special question as to supplies of coal in British ports to Confederate ships. (See protocol…

19th CenturyDiplomacyReconstruction
Letter

IV.—Argument of Mr. Evarts, one of the counsel of the United States, addressed to the tribunal of arbitration at Geneva, on the 5th and 6th August, 1872, in reply to the special argument of the counsel of Her Britannic Majesty. See protocols XVII and XVIII, August 5, 1872

From IV.—Argument of Mr. Evarts, one of the counsel of the United States, addressed
To the tribunal of arbitration at Geneva, on the 5th and 6th August, 1872, in reply to the special argument of the counsel of Her Britannic Majesty. See protocols XVII and XVIII
August 5, 1872

IV.—Argument of Mr. Evarts, one of the counsel of the United States, addressed to the tribunal of arbitration at Geneva, on the 5th and 6th August, 1872, in reply to…

19th CenturyDiplomacyReconstruction
Letter

III.—Argument of Sir Roundell Palmer on the questions of “due deligence,” the “effect of commissions upon the insurgent cruisers,” and the supplies of coal to such cruisers in British ports, July 29, 1872

From III.—Argument of Sir Roundell Palmer on the questions of “due deligence,” the “effect of commissions upon the insurgent cruisers,” and the supplies of coal
To such cruisers in British ports
July 29, 1872

III.—Argument of Sir Roundell Palmer on the questions of “due deligence,” the “effect of commissions upon the insurgent cruisers,” and the supplies of coal to such cruisers in British ports.…

19th CenturyDiplomacyReconstruction
Letter

Cushing to the foregoing statement of Sir Roundell Palmer.The Arbitrators declined to receive this Reply, having denied the request of the British Counsel, June 27, 1872

From Cushing
To the foregoing statement of Sir Roundell Palmer.The Arbitrators declined to receive this Reply, having denied the request of the British Counsel
June 27, 1872

II.—Reply of the counsel of the United States in response to the foregoing statement of Sir Roundell Palmer. [undated.] The Counsel of the United States desire to submit to the…

19th CenturyDiplomacyReconstruction
Letter

Annex D.–Further note on the clause presented by the government of the United States for expenditure alleged to P. S.—With reference to the note on page 351 as to the cruise of the Vanderbilt, it would appear from announcements in the New York Herald during the months of November and December, 1862, and January, 1863, that this vessel was at least 20 days in ports of the United States during those months. The following are the dates of her arrival and departure: Sailed from New York November 6, 1862; returned November 30. Sailed again December 11, and returned to Fortress Monroe January 17, 1863, from whence she did not sail again till after the 28th of the same month, when she left with the Weehawken monitor in tow. This suggests a still further abatement of $30,000 in the claim for this vessel, reducing the total amount, hypothetically considered admissible for arbitration on account of the Alabama, to $861,580.82, and that for the four vessels Class I to $910,460.24, January 1, 1872

From Annex D.–Further note on the clause presented by the government of the United States for expenditure alleged
To P. S.—With reference to the note on page 351 as to the cruise of the Vanderbilt, it would appear from announcements in the New York Herald during the months of November and December, 1862, and January, 1863, that this vessel was at least 20 days in ports of the United States during those months. The following are the dates of her arrival and departure: Sailed from New York November 6, 1862; returned November 30. Sailed again December 11, and returned to Fortress Monroe January 17, 1863, from whence she did not sail again till after the 28th of the same month, when she left with the Weehawken monitor in tow. This suggests a still further abatement of $30,000 in the claim for this vessel, reducing the total amount, hypothetically considered admissible for arbitration on account of the Alabama, to $861,580.82, and that for the four vessels Class I to $910,460.24
January 1, 1872

Annex D.–Further note on the clause presented by the government of the United States for expenditure alleged to have been incurred in the pursuit and capture of Confederate cruisers. [undated.]…

19th CenturyDiplomacyReconstruction