Recipient

Letters to American Peace Commissioners

A justice of the peace (JP) is a judicial officer of a lower court, elected or appointed by means of a commission to keep the peace. In past centuries the term commissioner of the peace was often used with the same meaning. Depending on the jurisdiction, such justices dispense summary justice or merely deal with local administrative applications in common law jurisdictions. Justices of the peace are appointed or elected from the citizens of the jurisdiction in which they serve, and are usually not required to have any formal legal education in order to qualify for the office. Some jurisdictions have varying forms of training for JPs. In some jurisdictions, the court over which a justice of the peace presides is called a justice court.

Source: Wikipedia
26 letters
Letter

Matthew Ridley to American Peace Commissioners, October 26, 1782

From Matthew Ridley
To American Peace Commissioners
October 26, 1782

Matthew Ridley informs the American Peace Commissioners of intelligence received from Joshua Johnson, including an extract from a letter by Mr. S. Chase, and requests they share this information with the French ministers if deemed necessary. Ridley also asks the commissioners to return the extract as he has not copied it and inquires whether Dr. Franklin has received letters from Mr. Carroll intended for him.

Letter

David Hartley to American Peace Commissioners, April 18, 1783

From David Hartley
To American Peace Commissioners
April 18, 1783

David Hartley proposes a supplemental treaty between Great Britain and the American States to facilitate the removal of British troops and the reopening of ports before the final peace treaty. He argues that the provisional articles effectively end the war and establish American independence, allowing for immediate cooperation similar to that between Britain and France. Hartley seeks to clarify ambiguities regarding the timing and nature of the final treaty to ensure smooth post-war relations.

Letter

Robert R Livingston to American Peace Commissioners, April 21, 1783

From Robert R Livingston
To American Peace Commissioners
April 21, 1783

Robert R. Livingston informs the American Peace Commissioners about his correspondence with British officials regarding the provisional Articles of peace, noting their cold and doubtful responses. He reports that Congress debates whether to immediately ratify the provisional Articles and whether to release prisoners, seeking clarification on the Articles' status as either preliminary or definitive. Livingston requests guidance from the Commissioners to resolve these uncertainties.

Letter

Marie-Joseph-Paul-Yves-Roch-Gilbert du Motier, marquis de Lafayette to American Peace Commissioners, May 12, 1783

From Marie-Joseph-Paul-Yves-Roch-Gilbert du Motier, marquis de Lafayette
To American Peace Commissioners
May 12, 1783

Marquis de Lafayette informs the American Peace Commissioners that European powers plan to sign their treaties simultaneously under the mediation of the Emperor and Russia, and asks whether America will accept this mediation for its treaty with Britain. He relays Count de Vergennes' suggestion to jointly request mediation from Vienna and Petersburg if America agrees. Lafayette also expresses hope that America will secure the harbor of L’Orient for its trade.

Letter

Robert R Livingston to American Peace Commissioners, May 31, 1783

From Robert R Livingston
To American Peace Commissioners
May 31, 1783

Robert R. Livingston informs the American Peace Commissioners of Congress's recent resolutions regarding the payment of British debts and expresses concern over their prolonged silence amid ongoing negotiations, including proposals from Holland. He cautions against making new commitments that might entangle the United States in European conflicts and urges careful consideration of the potential benefits before proceeding.

Letter

David Hartley to American Peace Commissioners, June 1, 1783

From David Hartley
To American Peace Commissioners
June 1, 1783

David Hartley urges the American Peace Commissioners to seriously consider a proposal for unlimited commercial reciprocity between Great Britain and the United States, emphasizing its importance not only for trade but as a political guarantee supporting the new American constitutions. He argues that such an alliance would benefit both nations more than alliances with other countries like France, due to their unique compatibility and mutual interests.

Letter

David Hartley to American Peace Commissioners, June 14, 1783

From David Hartley
To American Peace Commissioners
June 14, 1783

David Hartley communicates terms allowing American citizens to import and export goods in American ships to British territories under the same duties as before the Revolutionary War, while prohibiting direct trade between the United States and the British West Indies. He also ensures British subjects receive reciprocal trading rights in American ports under equivalent conditions. This arrangement aims to normalize commercial relations following the conflict.

Letter

Elias, Jr Boudinot to American Peace Commissioners, June 16, 1783

From Elias, Jr Boudinot
To American Peace Commissioners
June 16, 1783

Elias Boudinot informs the American Peace Commissioners that following the resignation of Minister Livingston, he must now deliver Congress's resolutions regarding their mission. He encloses recent resolutions to keep them informed during critical negotiations and expresses surprise at the lack of communication since the cessation of hostilities.

Letter

Elias Boudinot to American Peace Commissioners, November 1, 1783

From Elias Boudinot
To American Peace Commissioners
November 1, 1783

Elias Boudinot informs the American Peace Commissioners of Congress's finalized instructions following their June and July correspondence and congratulates them on the signing of the definitive Treaty of Paris in September 1783. He expresses national joy over the treaty, anticipates the British evacuation of New York, and honors the commissioners' diplomatic efforts.