Letter
John Jay requests Alexander Hamilton to provide a detailed account of the legal actions involving Richard Laurence of Staten Island, who claims these actions violate the Treaty of Peace. Jay emphasizes the importance of accurately determining the facts related to Laurence's complaint.
Letter
James Madison discusses ongoing debates over the Judiciary Department during the ratification of the Constitution, noting opposition may mask deeper interests. He anticipates attempts to add a bill of rights and other amendments as conditions for ratification, and outlines a strategy to preface ratification with general principles and recommend future amendments to secure support. Madison expresses cautious optimism about achieving a majority vote.
Letter
James Madison informs Alexander Hamilton that the Convention has ended with the ratification of the Constitution, but expresses concern over objectionable amendments, especially one limiting direct taxes. Madison suspects opponents of the Constitution will actively seek to undermine it through legislative means. He warns Hamilton to be alert to efforts aimed at regaining lost liberties by constitutional means.
Letter
James Madison informs Alexander Hamilton of the final outcome of their constitutional convention debates and mentions the rejection of a minority address by its own supporters. He notes the positive resolution of the matter and plans to provide more details upon traveling to New York. Madison also acknowledges recent communications from New Hampshire and Hamilton.
Letter
John Sullivan informs Alexander Hamilton that he has paid Captain Roche for delivering news of New Hampshire's adoption of the new Constitution and has drawn a bill on Hamilton to cover the expenses plus additional costs for discount and postage. Sullivan confirms compliance with Hamilton's instructions and expresses confidence that the bill will be honored.
Letter
Nathaniel Chipman writes to Alexander Hamilton seeking support for Vermont's admission to the Union under the new federal government. He explains that conflicting land claims between New York and Vermont threaten local unity and federal acceptance. Chipman urges resolution of these disputes to secure Vermont's full alignment with the federal cause.
Letter
John H. Kelly writes to Alexander Hamilton in 1788 from Tinmouth, Vermont, likely addressing matters related to the ongoing political developments of the time. The letter accompanies a communication from Nathaniel Chipman, suggesting coordinated correspondence. Specific content of Kelly's message remains unknown due to the letter's absence.
Letter
Baron von Steuben requests Alexander Hamilton to present a letter from Mr. R. Petters as clear evidence supporting Steuben's claim to compensation based on a contract made when entering U.S. service after the war. He refers to previous committees, including Hamilton's, that have considered this claim and asks Hamilton, as a current congressman, to share Petters' report with the committee.
Letter
Nathaniel Chipman informs Alexander Hamilton that Vermont's leadership generally supports joining the federal confederacy under the proposed terms and sees the current moment as favorable for accession. He discusses the state's willingness to accept federal powers without insisting on amendments and notes that exemption from war expenses would help unify Vermont citizens. Chipman requests Hamilton's suggestions to aid Vermont's decision before the upcoming assembly session.
Letter
Elbridge Gerry responds to Alexander Hamilton's request for clarification on Baron de Steuben’s claims, explaining the difficulty of precise details due to the time elapsed since Yorktown. Gerry recalls the army’s initial disorder and the relief brought by de Steuben’s arrival, noting the existing tensions among American officers regarding foreign appointments and rank disputes.
Letter
Jeremiah Olney informs Alexander Hamilton that Mr. H will not attend Congress until after the October session of the General Assembly, as he must fulfill his role as a representative for Charleston. Olney explains that a state law requires delegates to have special orders from the Assembly to take their seats, preventing timely representation from the state. He expresses concern that Mr. A will remain without a colleague in Congress for some time.
Letter
Callohill Minnes writes to Alexander Hamilton in 1788 requesting his intervention to prevent Congress from passing any resolution that would block the settlement of Colonel William Aylett’s two public accounts as deputy commissary general. Minnes seeks Hamilton’s support to ensure these financial matters are resolved.
Letter
George Washington responds to Alexander Hamilton with gratitude for his candid communication, expressing his preference for frank and friendly discourse. He explains his deliberate silence on rumors about his potential candidacy for office, fearing that discussing it might appear improper or self-promoting. Washington reveals his hope that electors might choose another candidate to spare him the difficult position of being compelled to accept a nomination.
Letter
Philadelphia April 9. 1791. Sir I have received the Letter you did me the honor to write me this morning and as the Secretary of State accidentally fell in before…
Letter
Bush Hill April 25. 1791 Dear sir I do my self the honour to transmit to You my Accounts which remain unsettled, for the last two years and Eight months…
Letter
Quincy October 17. 1798 Sir I have received, last night, a Letter from His Excellency Governor Jay, inclosing a Copy of an Act of the Legislature of New York, for…
Letter
Philadelphia May 22. 1800 Sir Inclosed is a Copy of a Letter, recd this morning from Col. Smith. I am at present at a loss to judge of it.—Will you…
Letter
Philadelphia June 20. 1800 Sir The itinerant Life I have led has prevented me from Acknowledging the Receipt of your favour of May 24th., till this time. Your Sentiments are…