Letter

Rutherford Alcock to the honorable Anson Burlingame, January 28, 1867

Sir Rutherford Alcock to Mr. Burlingame

Sir: I have recently received a despatch from her Majesty’s acting consul at Swatow, requesting information as to the relative rank and precedence of commanders in the United States navy and consuls. There appears to be a difference in the rules adopted compared with those of Great Britain, and I believe other European states. With us a commander of the royal navy ranks with a vice-consul, and a captain with a consul; but each takes precedence in these ranks before the consular officers of equal grade. In accordance with this rule, it is the duty of a consul to make the first call on a captain in the royal navy, and to receive it from a commander.

It is the usage for her Majesty’s consuls in China and Japan to pay the same visits of courtesy to the officers in command of ships of foreign states when they enter the ports; but Mr. Swinhoe writes that he was placed in some difficulty lately when the United States sloop of war, the Wachusett, Commander Schufeldt, arrived at Amoy. He was desirous of showing the same attention to that officer that he would have paid to a commander in her Majesty’s navy, but was precluded, by the regulations of his own service, from paying a first visit; and in conferring with his colleague, the United States consul, he was informed that, by the regulations of the United States, a commander when commanding is entitled to the first call from any United States consular officer under the rank of a consul general; and consequently no interchange of courtesies could take place.

If the title of commander does not give the same rank in the naval services of the two countries, I should be glad to receive any information on the subject, and in the event of a difference existing, it might promote a good understanding between the naval officers of the United States and the consular officers of other countries, to the advantage of both, and be otherwise desirable, if some communication took place between the two governments on the subject.

I have the honor to be, sir, your most obedient, humble servant,

RUTHERFORD ALCOCK.

His Excellency the honorable Anson Burlingame, &c., &c., &c.

Sources
FRUS u2014 Papers Relating to Foreign Affairs, Accompanying the Annual Message of the President to the Second Session of the Fortie View original source ↗
U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian. Papers Relating to Foreign Affairs, Accompanying the Annual Message of the President to the Second Session of the Fortie.