Letter
Hamilton Fish to Robert C. Schenck, June 8, 1872
No. 95. Mr. Fish to General Schenck.
[Telegram.]
Washington, June 8, 1872.
The reference to any conversation with Thornton is unjustified. I have invariably told him, as I have told you, that it is useless to discuss amendments to the proposed Article. In my telegram of 31st, I said the British amendment left a large class of very probable cases unprovided for. In conversation with Thornton I told him the same, and indicated some of those cases arising from the use of the word “belligerent,” but I indicated no change that was desired by me or by this Government. I thought the amendment proposed objectionable, and the last suggested amendment in telegram of yesterday does not remove the objection, and I refer to my telegram of 5th and repeat emphatically the last clause.
FISH.
Topics
Sources
FRUS u2014 Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, Transmitted to Congress with the Annual Message of the Pr
View original source ↗
U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, Transmitted to Congress with the Annual Message of the Pr.