Author

Letters from John Welsh

John Welsh may refer to:John Welsh of Ayr (1568-1622), religious leader John Welsh of Irongray, religious leader John Welsh (actor) (1904-1985), Irish actor John Welsh, Australian rules football player for Essendon John Welsh (biologist) (1901-2002), American physiologist John Welsh (bishop) (1856-1916), Bishop of Trinidad and Tobago, 1904-1916 John Welsh (diplomat) (1805-1886), American diplomat John Welsh, English football player for Grimsby Town John Welsh (meteorologist) (1824-1859), FRS, Superintendent of Kew Observatory Jon Welsh, Scottish rugby union player

Source: Wikipedia
41 letters
Also see 32 letters received by John Welsh →
Letter

John Welsh to Counsel will be good enough to inform the learned judge that application should have been made to the Marquis of Salisbury, secretary for foreign affairs, had time permitted it, January 28, 1879

From John Welsh
To Counsel will be good enough to inform the learned judge that application should have been made to the Marquis of Salisbury, secretary for foreign affairs, had time permitted it
January 28, 1879

[Inclosure 3 in No. 217.] Mr. Welsh to Messrs. Thomas Cooper & Co., Solicitors, &c. Legation of the United States, London, January 28, 1879. Gentlemen: The accompanying notice marked A…

19th CenturyDiplomacyReconstruction
Letter

John Welsh to P. S.—I have no doubt that, upon the receipt of this note, your lordship will take the necessary steps in the matter.—J. W. Inclosed: Copy of a notice of motion, January 28, 1879

From John Welsh
To P. S.—I have no doubt that, upon the receipt of this note, your lordship will take the necessary steps in the matter.—J. W. Inclosed: Copy of a notice of motion
January 28, 1879

[Inclosure 4 in No. 217.] Mr. Welsh to the Marquis of Salisbury. Legation of the United States, London, January 28, 1879. Immediate.] My Lord: At half-past six last evening, after…

19th CenturyDiplomacyReconstruction
Letter

John Welsh to Robert Phillimore has given judgment in the case of the steamer Parlement Beige, in a sense which may raise some difficulties between this country and Belgium. He held that the Parlement Beige, a steamer belonging to the Belgian Government, and carrying the mails between Dover and Ostend, washable to be arrested at the suit of an English subject. The judge’s decision rested on two grounds: First, that the Parlement Beige, being neither a ship of war, nor the pleasure yacht of a sovereign, and carrying packets of small articles in addition to the mails, could not claim immunity from arrest on the general principles of international law; the second ground was, that though article 6 of the postal treaty of 1876 between Great Britain and Belgium gives to the mail packets the status of ships of war, and exempts them from arrest or detention, yet as this treaty has never been sanctioned by Parliament, it was so far void that it could not take away the actual rights of a British subject, one of which was that he had a right to arrest a wrong-doing ship for damages done by it to his property. As the Belgian Government refuse to acknowledge the jurisdiction of the court, and did not appear, their case being voluntarily argued by the law officers of the Crown, the matter is not likely to rest as it stands.—(Pall Mall Gazette, March 18.), March 19, 1879

From John Welsh
To Robert Phillimore has given judgment in the case of the steamer Parlement Beige, in a sense which may raise some difficulties between this country and Belgium. He held that the Parlement Beige, a steamer belonging to the Belgian Government, and carrying the mails between Dover and Ostend, washable to be arrested at the suit of an English subject. The judge’s decision rested on two grounds: First, that the Parlement Beige, being neither a ship of war, nor the pleasure yacht of a sovereign, and carrying packets of small articles in addition to the mails, could not claim immunity from arrest on the general principles of international law; the second ground was, that though article 6 of the postal treaty of 1876 between Great Britain and Belgium gives to the mail packets the status of ships of war, and exempts them from arrest or detention, yet as this treaty has never been sanctioned by Parliament, it was so far void that it could not take away the actual rights of a British subject, one of which was that he had a right to arrest a wrong-doing ship for damages done by it to his property. As the Belgian Government refuse to acknowledge the jurisdiction of the court, and did not appear, their case being voluntarily argued by the law officers of the Crown, the matter is not likely to rest as it stands.—(Pall Mall Gazette, March 18.)
March 19, 1879

No. 192. Mr. Welsh to Mr. Evarts. Legation of the United States, London, March 19, 1879. Sir: I inclose a cutting from the Pall Mall Gazette of yesterday in relation…

19th CenturyDiplomacyReconstruction